일 | 월 | 화 | 수 | 목 | 금 | 토 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |
- Universal
- kimino namae wa
- distribution
- 서피스 프로
- 너의 이름은.
- Estsoft
- Sublime Text
- Probabilistic Safety Assessment
- Monte Carlo
- Generating
- 사이버 공격
- Importance measure
- poisson
- fault
- 마인드 맵
- 맥북 프로
- 텍스트 편집기
- Fussel-Vesely
- ICS
- Aliasing
- nyquist
- RRW
- 알마인드
- 몬테카를로
- 분포
- Frequency
- binomial
- UGF
- SCADA
- Surface Pro 4
- Today
- Total
Note
An Overview of PSA Importance Measures_201612 본문
by M. Van der Borst, H. Schoonakker
Summarize
To optimize the systems reliability level, risk importance is used for quantifying and optimizing reliability. FV (Fussell-Vesely) importance, RAW (Risk Achievement Worth) and BI importance are well known parameters to quantifying reliability level.
Risk Importance Measures
From the definition of FV importance, following equation can be driven.
When the case of
FV is highly depends on Xi. It means that FV describes the direct effect of the components unavailability.
However, the case of RAW (Risk Achievement Worth) with same approximation, RAW is not a function of Xi. Therefore, RAW shows that the defence of the rest of the installation against a failure of component i.
BI is closely related with RAW. Therefore, we can deal BI as similarly as RAW.
Which importance parameter is suitable?
Test and maintenance activities
If the failure rate is too low, then truncation error can occur. Truncation has an impact on the importance evaluation, in that events with high RAW may be deleted. Therefore, only BI importance is not suitable for this condition. Usually we prefer to use both FV-ranking and BI for safety improvement application.
Design of nuclear power plant
FV uses for optimizing risk and BI stands for optimizing safety.
<<한국어로 바꿀 예정>>
'Study > Paper Review' 카테고리의 다른 글
Fault Injection Techniques and Tools_201612 (0) | 2016.12.29 |
---|